It's sort of weird the way they say it's not replacement, it's demographic change. Whenever someone lies it's impossible to do so without invoking some illogical. Those are pretty much the same thing. The only difference is like saying a banana and a fruit are not the same. They are not mutually exclusive. It is both.
In that lie they often reveal the truth. A lot of these people are talking about age when talking about demographics. They are conflating the goal or intent, the gain as though mutually exclusive to the cost of achieving that goal. You have to love national economists.
I remember in the UK where replacement is most obvious (we're overcrowded so it's not like immigration has much room to be additive) something very strange happened at the turn of the millennium. Actually a lot of things happened. A lot of people aren't aware of the millennium cult but that's another story. If you don't remember literature from then you might have missed it.
The strange thing is that a major newspaper published the remarkable news that Britain was going to become majority non-white in the future and that it was the first time a population had voluntarily been replaced, that it to let it happen. It's hard to put into words how twisted this was.
It is not a 'theory' if it is actually happening. When empirical evidence taken directly from the national census can point to this fact, to deny it is to be obtuse-or happy that it is happening.
This form of pseudo magic the Left uses to pretend not to notice things happening is not restricted to demographic changes either. From crime stats to economic standards, they will deny objective facts that do not fit the ideology. Or if they do notice, it is only to browbeat conservatives on how it is all their fault and not the policies they enact.
It's sort of weird the way they say it's not replacement, it's demographic change. Whenever someone lies it's impossible to do so without invoking some illogical. Those are pretty much the same thing. The only difference is like saying a banana and a fruit are not the same. They are not mutually exclusive. It is both.
In that lie they often reveal the truth. A lot of these people are talking about age when talking about demographics. They are conflating the goal or intent, the gain as though mutually exclusive to the cost of achieving that goal. You have to love national economists.
I remember in the UK where replacement is most obvious (we're overcrowded so it's not like immigration has much room to be additive) something very strange happened at the turn of the millennium. Actually a lot of things happened. A lot of people aren't aware of the millennium cult but that's another story. If you don't remember literature from then you might have missed it.
The strange thing is that a major newspaper published the remarkable news that Britain was going to become majority non-white in the future and that it was the first time a population had voluntarily been replaced, that it to let it happen. It's hard to put into words how twisted this was.
It is not a 'theory' if it is actually happening. When empirical evidence taken directly from the national census can point to this fact, to deny it is to be obtuse-or happy that it is happening.
This form of pseudo magic the Left uses to pretend not to notice things happening is not restricted to demographic changes either. From crime stats to economic standards, they will deny objective facts that do not fit the ideology. Or if they do notice, it is only to browbeat conservatives on how it is all their fault and not the policies they enact.